Beyond the Big Four: A Journey into Niche Build Systems

Posted on in programming

cover image for article

In the bustling marketplace of C++ build systems, the "Big Four" – CMake, Ninja, Meson, and Bazel – reign supreme. But venture beyond their well-trodden paths, and you'll discover a hidden realm of specialized tools, each honed for specific needs like embedded development, resource management, and parallel builds. Let's embark on a voyage to uncover these hidden gems: Premake, Buck, and Tup, and see how they might fit your unique coding puzzle.

1. Premake: Master of Cross-Platform Elegance:

Imagine a build system that effortlessly glides across diverse platforms, crafting native build files like a seasoned polyglot. Enter Premake, a Lua-based marvel lauded for its cross-platform prowess. Whether your code craves the embrace of Windows, Linux, or macOS, Premake writes the perfect build script in each dialect, saving you from platform-specific headaches.

-- Premake4.lua file

workspace "MyAwesomeProject"
    projects { "src" }
    configurations {
        "Debug",
        "Release"
    }

project "src"
    kind "ConsoleApplication"
    files { "main.cpp", "utils.cpp" }
    links { "myAwesomeLibrary" }

    configuration "Debug"
        defines { "DEBUG" }
        flags { "/debug" }

    configuration "Release"
        defines { "NDEBUG" }
        flags { "/optimize" }

This code snippet showcases Premake's elegance. It defines projects, configurations, files, and even platform-specific tweaks with concise clarity. No more wrestling with cryptic macros or platform-specific nuances – Premake handles it all, freeing you to focus on what matters – your code.

2. Buck: The Android Champion:

In the arena of Android development, the battle cry of "Build faster, code smarter" echoes through the ranks. And at the forefront of this charge stands Buck, Facebook's open-source build system tailored specifically for Android projects. Buck brings its big data expertise to bear, utilizing dependency caching and parallel builds to shave precious seconds off your build times.

# buck build file

android_binary(
    name = "my_awesome_app",
    srcs = ["main.cpp", "utils.cpp"],
    deps = ["//libs:my_awesome_library"],
)

java_library(
    name = "my_awesome_library",
    srcs = ["src/java/Library.java"],
)

Buck leverages Python for its build language, providing a familiar syntax for many developers. It shines in complex Android projects, seamlessly juggling Java, C++, and other languages, ensuring swift builds and efficient resource management.

3. Tup: The Parallel Build Maestro:

Imagine a build system that unleashes the symphony of parallel builds, harnessing the power of your multi-core processor to orchestrate a breathtakingly efficient construction of your project. This is the magic of Tup, a dependency-based build system that prioritizes efficient utilization of your computing resources.

# Tupfile

define("my_executable", {
  sources = ["main.cpp", "utils.cpp"];
  link = ["my_awesome_library"];
});

define("my_awesome_library", {
  sources = ["src/my_library.cpp"];
});

.target = ":my_executable";

Tup's beauty lies in its simplicity. Its terse syntax focuses on defining targets and their dependencies, allowing it to intelligently parallelize build tasks whenever possible. This makes it a natural choice for projects with numerous, independent modules, where Tup unleashes its multi-core magic to shave time off your build process.

Beyond the Mainstream:

Premake, Buck, and Tup are just a taste of the niche build systems waiting to be discovered. Tools like SCons excel in embedded development, while Pants, with its focus on Python and Go, offers unique value for specific languages. Remember, the "best" build system is not a universal crown, but the one that perfectly complements your project's needs and workflow.

Choosing Your Ally:

When selecting your niche build system, consider these factors:

  • Project size and complexity: Does your project require the scalability of Bazel or the agility of Tup?
  • Target platform: Is cross-platform prowess like Premake crucial, or do you need Android-specific features like Buck?
  • Development workflow: Does your team value clear syntax like Meson, or the efficiency of parallel builds like Tup?

Conclusion:

Like a skilled craftsman choosing the right tool for the job, selecting the perfect build system empowers you to build with purpose and precision. Choose wisely, embrace the diversity, and remember – the power to build a remarkable software masterpiece lies not just in your code, but also in the tools you choose to wield.

Part 5 of the Best Build System for C++ series

My Bookshelf

Reading Now

Other Stuff