When working with Google Cloud Storage (GCS) via gsutil
, most file operations
run smoothly. However, occasional cryptic error messages may appear that leave
you scratching your head. One such error is:
Semaphore released too many times MiB] 99% Done
CommandException: 1 files/objects could not be copied/removed.
make: *** [Makefile:90: gs_upload] Error 1
At first glance, this error message can be confusing, especially when you see the mention of a semaphore. In computing, a semaphore is used to control access to a shared resource by multiple processes or threads. Seeing “released too many times” suggests some concurrency or synchronization hiccup.
In this article, we’ll explore possible causes behind this error, offer
troubleshooting steps, and suggest best practices for managing concurrency when
using gsutil
.
The Error in Context
A typical scenario where this error might arise:
- Running
gsutil
in a Makefile: You have a Make task likemake gs_upload
, which callsgsutil
to upload files to a GCS bucket. - Multithreaded or Parallel Operations: Perhaps you used the
-m
(multithreaded) option withgsutil
, or have environment variables configured to allow concurrency.
The error appears like:
Semaphore released too many times MiB] 99% Done
CommandException: 1 files/objects could not be copied/removed.
make: *** [Makefile:90: gs_upload] Error 1
Key takeaways:
- “Semaphore released too many times”: Typically signals a concurrency or resource management glitch.
- “1 files/objects could not be copied/removed.”: Indicates the actual failure impacted at least one file operation.
- Non-zero exit code: Terminates your Make task, causing the build or deployment to fail.
Possible Causes
- Multithread / Multiprocess Bugs
Ifgsutil
or its underlying libraries encounter an unexpected state in concurrency, you could see a semaphore mismatch error. - Library or Environment Mismatch
Sometimes Python environments and libraries thatgsutil
depends on (e.g.,httplib2
,oauth2client
,six
) may be out of sync, causing concurrency mismanagement. - Transient Network / Timeout Issues
Intermittent network problems that force threads to fail in unexpected ways can lead to concurrency cleanups that don’t fully match the initial thread counts. - Running in a Constrained Environment
If you’re runninggsutil
on a system (e.g., a CI container) with limited resources or unusual process constraints, concurrency synchronization may break under stress.
Troubleshooting Steps
1. Retry the Command without Multithreading
If you’re currently using -m
(multithreaded) in your gsutil
command, try
removing it to see if the error goes away:
# Original (multithreaded)
gsutil -m cp -r ./local-folder gs://my-bucket/path/
# Try single-threaded
gsutil cp -r ./local-folder gs://my-bucket/path/
If single-thread mode succeeds, it suggests the concurrency logic was at least partly responsible.
2. Update gsutil and Dependencies
Sometimes concurrency bugs are resolved in newer releases:
gcloud components update
(or if installed via another package manager, use that method). This ensures you
have the latest gsutil
and libraries.
3. Inspect Your Environment
- Python Library Versions: If you’re using a standalone
pip
-installed version ofgsutil
, ensure that your environment doesn’t have mismatched library versions. - System Limits: Check memory, CPU, and user process/thread limits (
ulimit
on Linux) to confirm your environment can handle the concurrency.
4. Check for Partial Uploads or Corrupted Files
In some cases, a file might be partially uploaded or removed, causing gsutil
to
throw an error. Inspect your GCS bucket to see if the file is partially present,
then remove or rename it before retrying.
5. Reduce Parallelism
If you still need concurrency but want to reduce the chance of hitting concurrency bugs, tweak the parallel process and thread counts:
gsutil -o "GSUtil:parallel_process_count=1" -o "GSUtil:parallel_thread_count=5" \
-m cp -r ./local-folder gs://my-bucket/path/
This cuts down concurrency while retaining some parallelism.
Makefile Considerations
When the error appears in a Makefile context:
gs_upload:
gsutil -m cp -r ./local-folder gs://my-bucket/path/
Consider:
- Using
.PHONY
vs. real targets: If you rely on concurrency or multiple Make jobs, ensure you’re not inadvertently calling multiplegsutil
commands in parallel. - Serializing Steps: If your Make tasks are independent but run concurrently,
add dependencies or force serialization with the
-j1
flag inmake
to avoid concurrency overhead from both Make andgsutil
.
Interpretation and Next Steps
The “Semaphore released too many times” error hints at a concurrency mismatch
within gsutil
or its underlying libraries. In many cases, simply retrying
without -m
or reducing concurrency resolves the issue. Keeping gsutil
updated
and verifying your environment’s library versions are also good practices.
If the error persists after these adjustments, you may want to:
- Check if your environment is particularly resource-constrained.
- File a bug report with detailed logs and environment information in the gsutil GitHub repository or via GCP support.
Conclusion
Encountering an error like “Semaphore released too many times” when using
gsutil
is typically a sign of concurrency or synchronization issues within the
tool’s multithreading logic. By adjusting concurrency flags, updating software,
and ensuring a stable environment, you can often mitigate or eliminate the error.
While frustrating, this glitch reminds us that parallel operations can introduce
race conditions or resource mismanagement in even the most robust cloud utilities.
With careful troubleshooting and environment management, you can continue to
leverage gsutil
for fast and reliable GCS operations—minus the semaphore
headaches.